The case could reshape the understanding and enforcement of protections for journalistic sources, highlighting the tension between law enforcement interests and press freedoms.
Ellis described the conduct of solicitors representing the journalists as 'aggressive,' noting a lack of sympathy in interactions with the Law Society.
Darren Ellis expressed disappointment with the Law Society's stance that an investigation would only proceed if a criminal offense was proven.
When asked about his views on the performance of law society representatives, Ellis remarked they were 'unsympathetic' and 'defensive' regarding journalistic protections.
[
Collection
]
[
|
...
]