A federal judge says carry-permit holders have a right to armed self-defense on public transit

The Court finds that Defendants have failed to meet their burden. That failure is dispositive. This highlights the responsibilities of the government to provide historical context for gun regulations.

In Bruen, the Supreme Court found that the Statute of Northampton wasn't a general ban on bearing weapons. Instead, the offense was arming oneself to terrify.

Read at Reason.com