In a $20-$40 Omaha eight-or-better game with a kill at the Wynn, strategic decision-making was crucial. The author held A 9 8 3 from the cutoff position after a loose player limped in. While raising could create pressure on blinds, it risked revealing a limited hand range. The author ultimately opted to limp, allowing a pro in the small blind to raise, which showcased the strength of his hand. This decision safeguarded the author from potential three-bets and unfavorable positions, exemplifying the complexities of poker strategy in high-stakes games.
On the downside, it would limit the range of hands I could have. I would have a wider combination of almost any four playable cards.
If I did choose to raise, the hand I actually held would be closer to the bottom of my range in this spot as it didn't have particularly strong high potential.
I was glad I chose to limp since it exposed the power of his hand by letting him raise.
This would mean that I am behind any A-2, and I also lack backup protection in the event of pairing the ace or the three.
Collection
[
|
...
]