The article discusses 'pet speciesism', a bias favoring pet animals over other species, exemplified by the emotional investment American pet owners have towards their pets, with nearly 97% viewing them as family. Peter Singer's critique of speciesism poses that all animals should be valued equally, while George Orwell suggests some animals are seen as more equal than others. Recent findings in behavioral economics explain this phenomenon, showing that emotional biases significantly influence our decision-making regarding animal welfare, as demonstrated in studies contrasting the preference for saving pets versus farm animals.
Nearly 97% of American pet owners think of their companion animals as family members, highlighting pet speciesism and the emotional biases influencing our priorities in animal welfare.
Singer argued that speciesism favors humans over other animals, yet recent studies reveal a specific form called 'pet speciesism,' which shows strong emotional biases towards pets.
Caviola and Capraro's research indicates that the bias favoring pets over farmed animals is significant, illustrating human emotional reactions can overshadow logical reasoning in ethical decisions.
Behavioral economics explains why we allocate such vast resources to pets while neglecting other animals, linking our emotional connections to spending patterns and moral considerations.
Collection
[
|
...
]