The article discusses the quality of experience (QoE) modeling for mobile AIGC, emphasizing the importance of service latency in copyright ownership. As clients rush to publish their outputs first, latency is critical. The paper outlines a comprehensive evaluation framework, combining objective key performance indicators (KPIs) with subjective assessments of AIGC outputs. It proposes a reputation-based selection model that facilitates effective service provider choice while ensuring quality and accountability in mobile AIGC interactions, ultimately enhancing user satisfaction and service reliability.
Service latency is critical for AIGC; clients prioritize quick outputs to secure copyright, affecting how objective quality is evaluated and perceived.
Objective evaluation of AIGC services involves assessing multiple KPIs, including latency and subjective user experience, which plays a significant role in satisfaction.
The reputation-based model for mobile AIGC ensures clients can select service providers effectively, enhancing accountability and quality through a two-phase interaction.
Understanding subjective experiences in AIGC output evaluation is crucial, highlighting how personal standards shape user satisfaction amidst diverse creative outputs.
Collection
[
|
...
]