The US administration is reportedly planning to cut NASA's science budget by nearly 50%, jeopardizing numerous missions and ongoing scientific endeavors. This move follows speculation within the industry and has drawn significant criticism from organizations like the Planetary Society, which labeled it a 'dark age for space science.' If approved, the cuts would likely lead to the premature termination of many active projects and could risk a brain drain among scientists. The budget's implications are compounded by the recent nomination of Jared Isaacman as NASA's administrator, who advocates for science, raising questions about the future influence he may wield during upcoming budget discussions.
The proposed budget cuts could result in a nearly 50 percent reduction in NASA's science budget, threatening numerous current and future missions.
The Planetary Society described the cuts as a 'dark age for space science' and warned of irreversible damage to valuable spacecraft.
Former Voyager scientist Dr. Garry Hunt called the situation 'absurd' and 'destructive,' emphasizing that it creates greater opportunities for ESA due to NASA's instability.
With the impending budget cuts, concerns have arisen about brain drain as NASA scientists may seek employment elsewhere.
Collection
[
|
...
]