Tristan Casabianca emphasized that the discrepancies in the data from the 1988 carbon dating challenge the conclusions made by the three labs, indicating that 'the lack of precision seriously affects the reliability of the 95 percent confidence' in declaring the shroud a medieval forgery.
Casabianca highlighted that while his newfound insights do not definitively prove the shroud is ancient or that it was Jesus' burial cloth, they emphasize that such factors cannot be dismissed 'without a re-analysis.'
The original 1988 study claimed with '95 percent confidence' that the Shroud of Turin was produced between 1260 and 1390 AD, but Casabianca’s findings suggest a varied range in the raw data that has not previously been publicized.
He stated that after analyzing the raw data, 'the estimates varied by decades,' casting doubt on the shroud's medieval authenticity and suggesting the need for a thorough re-examination of its age.
[
Collection
]
[
|
...
]