A Texas pipeline company, Energy Transfer, is suing Greenpeace over allegations of defamation and disruptive actions during protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline. The case centers on protests that occurred from 2016 to 2017, where the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe argued that the pipeline jeopardized their water supply. The lawsuit followed claims of trespass and vandalism attributed to Greenpeace's influence, seeking millions in damages. Greenpeace maintains that the lawsuit threatens free speech rights and their operational future, asserting that the claims are unsubstantiated and that Greenpeace International is incorrectly implicated in U.S. activities.
Energy Transfer's lawsuit against Greenpeace alleges defamation and disruption during protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline, raising concerns over free speech.
Greenpeace contends that the lawsuit aims to stifle criticism of the oil industry and jeopardizes the organization's future and free expression.
The case, rooted in protests from 2016-2017, spotlights tensions surrounding energy development and the rights of environmental activists amidst allegations of violence.
Greenpeace International argues it should not be held accountable in the U.S. lawsuit, insisting it operates separately and was not involved in the protests.
Collection
[
|
...
]