Heiress killed by husband' in plot to receive 3.5m insurance pay-out, court hears
Briefly

The defendant went about setting up policies with indecent haste. He killed her because of the significant motive of the insurance policies. This case is extra-ordinary because the defendant lies to almost everybody in this case.
All of the facts, taken together, make it substantially more likely that he killed Paula. Ms Anderson said McPherson, despite running out of money, was paying around 500 a month on insurance.
Read at www.independent.co.uk
[
add
]
[
|
|
]