The Appellate Division stated, "We recognize the trauma attendant upon sexual abuse. However, we disagree with the dissent that the same principle should allow plaintiff to repudiate a contractual arrangement after accepting its benefits for over five years." This feedback illustrates the court's acknowledgment of the sensitive nature of the allegations while also reinforcing the validity of the signed nondisclosure agreement.
The dissenting judge argued that Ganieva remained under "the same continuing duress" until March 2021, when she spoke out about her lengthy relationship with Black. This perspective highlights the ongoing psychological impact that the arrangement and allegations may have had on Ganieva’s ability to act.
Collection
[
|
...
]