Lawyers for Mayor Eric Adams contended that the federal bribery charge lacks merit, referencing a recent Supreme Court ruling that heightened the standards for proving corruption. This 25-page defense filing argues that the accusations do not satisfy the legal standards defined for bribery offenses, which may significantly undermine the prosecution's case.
Prosecutors have alleged that during his tenure, Mayor Adams accepted travel benefits exceeding $100,000 and received illegal campaign contributions from Turkish officials. The indictment claims these actions involved granting political favors in return, which suggests a troubling intertwining of personal benefit and public service.
Collection
[
|
...
]