A planned 200-unit development on the Upper East Side is stalled after the builder clashed with a neighboring property over safety access. The neighbor demands $20,000 for allowing access to protect their four-story building during construction. Developer attorney Eli Raider criticizes the demands as unreasonable compared to industry norms. The site previously housed multiple businesses and apartments, illustrating a conflict between ongoing development and existing community interests. The legal dispute raises broader questions about urban development and the interaction between large-scale construction and neighboring properties.
Neighboring property owners have rejected a standard agreement for safety access, demanding $20,000 up front, thereby putting a critical 200-unit development on hold.
Developer attorney Eli Raider denounced the demand for $20,000 as being 'out of market,' stating that such charges are unusual and hinder the progress of the housing project.
The development site was previously home to numerous local businesses and apartments, now turned to rubble, highlighting the tensions between local interests and new development.
As building norms dictate agreements for protective measures during construction, the refusal to comply may reflect broader issues in urban developments, particularly with power dynamics between large developers and smaller property owners.
Collection
[
|
...
]