The article highlights the contentious legal landscape surrounding the indictment of New York City's Mayor Eric Adams. It underscores a letter sent to Judge Ho by Adams' attorneys, pointing out statements made by Attorney General Pam Bondi, which they argue constitute admissions under the Federal Rules of Evidence. These remarks suggest a perception of the charges as weak, raising issues of potential bias and improper influence. The article draws contrasts between public reactions from various attorneys involved, particularly regarding perceived bias in the legal proceedings.
We are writing to alert the Court to recent out-of-court statements by Attorney General Pam Bondi and her chief of staff that constitute admissions of a party opponent under the Federal Rules of Evidence.
The Attorney General described the indictment in this case as 'incredibly weak,' and said that the charges against the Mayor were so weak she doubted prosecutors could secure a guilty verdict.
When Damien Williams posted a website barely mentioning Adams, Spiro deemed it a dangerous attempt to influence a legal outcome.
Collection
[
|
...
]