In the case of Council of City of N.Y. v. Adams, Judge Mary Rosado addressed the implications of an Executive Order allegedly negotiated by Mayor Adams to exchange sanctuary city protections for the dismissal of his criminal prosecution. The court highlighted concerns regarding the rule of law, mentioning meetings between Adams and federal officials. The case raises questions about the Mayor's ability to co-operate with federal immigration enforcement while facing an indictment, emphasizing complications in his powers as a result of his legal troubles.
This case, at its essence, seeks to maintain the rule of law. Plaintiff-Petitioner seeks to nullify an Executive Order issued allegedly because Mayor Adams negotiated away sanctuary city protections for a dismissal of his ongoing criminal prosecution.
Mayor Adams' attorneys repeatedly urged what amounted to a quid pro quo, indicating that Adams would be in a position to assist with immigration enforcement priorities only if the indictment were dismissed.
The federal government cannot possibly rely on Mayor Adams to be a fully effective partner in all situations in ongoing public-safety missions while he is under federal indictment.
Mayor Adams' abilities to exercise his powers have also been complicated by his indictment, including his powers to prevent challenges to immigration enforcement and to re-open the ICE office.
Collection
[
|
...
]