Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Arthur Engoron ruled Friday that the governor's team had not met the burden to have the cases dismissed, allowing litigants seeking to overturn the governor's temporary pause which is now approaching its fourth month to argue in earnest that Hochul's actions were unlawful. This indicates that the legal challenges against Governor Hochul’s pause on congestion pricing will proceed, in light of significant environmental and urban issues at stake.
Dror Ladin, senior attorney at Earthjustice, emphasized the gravity of the situation, stating that Governor Hochul attempted to shut the courthouse doors to New Yorkers concerned about air quality and public transit. He argued that the judge's decision reaffirmed that the governor's decisions are not above the law, highlighting the importance of accountability in governance and environmental protection.
The program, which aimed to charge a $15 toll for most motorists entering lower Manhattan, was supposed to fund MTA capital improvements, such as upgrading the aging signal system and increasing accessibility in subway stations. The lawsuits challenge the legality of the governor's decision to pause this funding mechanism, underscoring the conflict between economic policies and environmental responsibilities.
Both lawsuits argue that Hochul's pause not only violates established statutes but also hinders progress towards reducing automotive traffic in Manhattan’s central business district, a key factor in addressing environmental concerns and improving public transportation infrastructure, showing the intricate balance between urban governance and sustainability.
Collection
[
|
...
]