X Corp's case underscores the complexity of global censorship, as officials' decisions on content removal often conflict with the principles of public access to information.
The Australian eSafety Commissioner acknowledged that X was justified in resisting an order to block footage of a terrorist attack, emphasizing the importance of public access.
The Administrative Appeals Tribunal resolved proceedings, confirming X's position against eSafety's removal notice, highlighting the need for discussions around online safety legislation.
Six months later, the eSafety Commissioner conceded to X’s argument about the importance of Australians being able to view the controversial footage.
Collection
[
|
...
]