What's Next After Jack Smith's Big Jan. 6 Evidence Drop
Briefly

"Working with a team of private co-conspirators, the defendant acted as a candidate when he pursued multiple criminal means to disrupt, through fraud and deceit, the government function by which votes are collected and counted, a function in which the defendant, as President, had no official role."
"In the filing, Smith also laid out why Trump's criminal actions constituted 'unofficial acts' that are not protected by the Supreme Court's presidential immunity decision and why all the evidence he wants to introduce is fair game to use at trial."
Read at Slate Magazine
[
|
]