'We're ten minutes in and nobody's been able to give a straight answer' - the winners and losers from RTE's leaders' debate
Briefly

In a dry report of the night’s proceedings, the leader's granddaughter of a refugee spoke passionately about the state’s role in housing, emphasizing children in homelessness. The stark contrast between their earnest plea and the audience’s distractions captured the essence of the evening — a need for intervention and compassion from the State.
While many attendees may have missed the call to action regarding housing, it underscored the persistent issues faced by vulnerable populations, particularly children. Her commitment to advocating for systemic change through interventionist approaches resonated deeply, even if the operational leadership style did not inspire immediate engagement.
Ultimately, the political discourse turned into moments of unintentional tedium, yet the message about advocating for children affected by homelessness lingered. The need for an active State intervention wasn't just a talking point, but a critical urgency that should galvanize leaders into taking concrete steps forward.
The night’s consensus, marked by a lack of excitement, highlighted the disconnect in addressing pressing social issues like housing. As the night wrapped up, the individual's ardent appeal for action signified a hope that leadership could focus more on tangible impacts for those in need.
Read at Independent
[
|
]