A federal judge ruled that a UMass Lowell student's First Amendment rights were violated after he faced disciplinary action for alleged sexual misconduct involving inappropriate discussions and seeking hugs from coworkers. The accusations were made by four colleagues, leading to the university finding him responsible. The judge, however, stated there was insufficient evidence of disruptive behavior, noting that the student's actions fell short of a 'pervasive pattern.' The university was granted qualified immunity from damages despite the ruling, as the student focused on clearing his name.
The judge ruled the Massachusetts student's First Amendment rights were violated after he was disciplined for discussing sexual topics and seeking affection from colleagues.
The university's investigation concluded that the student was 'responsible' for sexual misconduct, with Judge Montecalvo highlighting a lack of disruptive evidence.
Collection
[
|
...
]