Jen Taylor, a local resident, expressed her concerns about the tree felling, stating, "If the trees have been there causing no problems to the railway, then they should be replaced to maintain the greenery along the line." She emphasized the impact on wildlife and habitats, arguing that the removal of trees seems unreasonable given the current climate. This resonates with the sentiments of the community, highlighting the need for a balance between railway safety and environmental preservation.
Ruth Kettle-Frisby, co-ordinator for the Havering Green party, described the situation as "woodland destruction that flies in the face of the care we expect to be afforded to our trees." This indicates a wider community sentiment against the lack of transparency and thoughtfulness regarding tree management. The removal of trees is not just an ecological concern; it is also viewed as detrimental to community aesthetics and well-being.
Jodie Satterley, a nearby resident who started a petition against the tree removal, criticized the lack of clarity from Network Rail on tree safety assessments, asking, "How do they determine how a tree is dangerous? Can they trim it instead?" She calls for more transparency in the process, reiterating the need for the community to understand the criteria that deem a tree as dangerous before such drastic actions are taken.
Collection
[
|
...
]