The claims about ABC News aiding Kamala Harris in the debate were based on an obviously questionable source, riddled with inconsistencies, and ultimately fell apart under scrutiny.
The media landscape today prioritizes outrage and viral claims over factual analysis, leading to misinformation spreading rapidly without proper vetting or context.
The affidavit promoting the debunked claims came from a dubious source known for misinformation and lacked verifiable details that would support the allegations made.
Instead of critical discussion regarding the debate's content, the focus turned to sensational claims, showcasing a shift in media priorities that favors shock over fact.
Collection
[
|
...
]