The 2024 choice on regulation: Trump wants America unleashed, Harris wants it strangled
Briefly

Donald Trump represents a relentless push against an army of unelected bureaucrats that are stifling American progress, particularly during the Harris-Biden administration, as evidenced by rising regulatory hurdles and a pervasive anti-business mindset within the federal government. This climate, characterized by stagnation and red tape, needs a challenger who can restore America's dynamism and prosperity. Trump's previous administration highlighted a clear contrast against these bureaucratic tendencies, making him a viable candidate to lead a resurgence in American entrepreneurship and innovation.
Prominent business figures like JPMorgan's Jamie Dimon are vocalizing their dissatisfaction with the debilitating regulatory environment currently infesting Washington, D.C. They express a collective frustration with the overwhelming 'red tape' and regulatory overreach that has characterized the Biden-Harris years, signaling a desperate need for the return of pragmatic governance that fosters business growth and innovation, rather than stifling it with endless regulations. This sentiment underscores the urgency behind Trump's candidacy, which is seen as a remedy to such bureaucratic stagnation.
Lina Khan, as the Chair of the Federal Trade Commission, embodies the struggle against American entrepreneurship by targeting successful firms and individuals, such as Elon Musk, under the guise of protecting the market. Her actions, driven more by political ideology than actual regulatory needs, have led to a chilling effect where companies are abandoning prospective deals, fearing her agency's scrutiny. This not only hampers individual innovation but represents a broader pattern of the regulatory state leveraging power to discourage competition and success, demonstrating the necessity for a shift back towards a pro-business environment.
Read at New York Post
[
|
]