The suggestion by prosecutors to postpone Trump’s sentencing until after 2029 highlights the absurdity and unprecedented nature of this case, risking legal precedent.
New York law stipulates that sentencing should occur without undue delay, raising questions about the practicality and legality of delaying it for over four years.
The DA's argument that we might still sentence Trump post-presidency raises numerous hypothetical concerns, especially given the many uncertainties involved in a time gap that long.
The absurdity of trying a two-term former president for actions from over a decade ago presents a myriad of practical and legal complications.
Collection
[
|
...
]