The court clarified that both nations and corporations carry a responsibility to reduce their carbon emissions, aligning with the Paris climate agreement, suggesting future claims are viable.
Lawyer Roger Cox expressed optimism, stating that despite the disappointment, the ruling offers legal avenues for Milieudefensie's ongoing fight against major polluters.
Thom Wetzer noted that the ruling leaves room for more climate litigation, emphasizing that Shell's case does not end the movement against corporate emissions.
The court found no basis for a mandated 45% reduction by 2030 but confirmed the ability to enforce absolute emission reduction targets on corporations.
Collection
[
|
...
]