Randy Schekman expressed deep concern over eLife's financial viability after losing its impact factor, a critical metric in academic publishing, stating, 'I wish that we had been allowed to evolve without the influence of that phony number.' This reflects the tension between innovative publishing models and traditional metrics.
Timothy Behrens, co-editor-in-chief of eLife, acknowledged the challenges posed by the loss of the impact factor for researchers, while noting, 'It looks so far like submissions are not collapsing. But it's very early days.' This indicates cautious optimism as the journal navigates changes.
Collection
[
|
...
]