The Appellate Division, Second Department, affirmed the decision requiring businessman Mark Gaft to pay $742,993 to his former partner for fraud and unjust enrichment claims.
The appellate court upheld the lower court's judgment, which came after a jury found that Gaft deceived Yakubov and wrongfully profited from their partnership.
Trotman's case against Vermont companies was dismissed because New York lacks jurisdiction over defendants based outside the state, following a motor vehicle accident.
The appellate panel determined that the jury's decision regarding Gaft's fraud was well-supported by the evidence presented, disregarding Gaft's claims of procedural issues.
Collection
[
|
...
]