The mere fact that artificial intelligence has played a role, which continues to expand in our everyday lives, does not make the results generated by artificial intelligence admissible in Court. This highlights the importance of traditional evidence in legal settings, especially as AI becomes more integrated into various industries.
The evidence showed that rather than the son losing money from his aunt's management of the trust, the sale of the property in 2022 led to no attributable loss of capital, and in fact, it generated an overall profit to the Trust. This demonstrates the crucial role of thorough analysis in legal cases, especially when financial claims are involved.
Ranson did not seemingly spare much effort by employing Copilot in a way that damaged his credibility in court. It would not have been difficult for the expert to pull the necessary data directly from primary sources, so the process didn't even save much time—but that shortcut came at the cost of the expert's credibility. This indicates the legal risks associated with over-reliance on AI.
Collection
[
|
...
]