Dr. Dewi Evans firmly refuted claims made by Lucy Letby’s barrister that he revised his views on the infant deaths, labeling the assertions as 'unsubstantiated' and 'inaccurate.' He highlighted a troubling lack of decorum in presenting legal arguments outside of court, especially in such a sensitive case concerning the tragic loss of young lives. Evans expressed that this approach only adds to the distress of grieving families affected by Letby’s actions.
Letby’s barrister, Mark McDonald, stated his intention to seek a court appeal based on the alleged unreliability of Evans' expert testimony. However, Evans responded directly, asserting that the method employed by McDonald was not only biased but also disrespectful to the families of the victims. He emphasized that a senior barrister publicly advocating for a client in such a manner was unprecedented, and any potential appeal should be handled solely within the legal framework of the court.
Collection
[
|
...
]