The recent US court ruling indicating that fluoride in drinking water poses potential neurotoxicity, particularly for infants, marks a significant turning point in the public debate.
This landmark legal win compels the EPA to reevaluate existing fluoride regulations, acknowledging concerns about developmental impacts and signaling a shift in long-held public health practices.
Stuart Cooper commented on the ruling, emphasizing that after years of advocacy, this fair court adjudication finally recognizes and assesses the risks associated with fluoridation.
The court's decision, while not defining specific damaging fluoride levels, suggests that current exposure from US drinking water presents an unreasonable risk to children's brain health.
Collection
[
|
...
]