Prosecutors have established a means to seize privileged communications, a strategy highlighted by special counsel Jack Smith's pursuit of Donald Trump's direct messages without notifying him.
X argued that the gag order imposed by the court was an unconstitutional prior restraint on free speech, asserting it violated legal protections for presidential communications.
The Supreme Court chose not to review X's appeal, indicating the government’s order was reasonable and necessary to prevent evidence tampering or witness intimidation during an active investigation.
Jack Smith emphasized that the nondisclosure order was narrowly tailored to protect the integrity of the investigation, stating that revealing the warrant to Trump could jeopardize ongoing legal matters.
Collection
[
|
...
]