Penny's defense argued that his actions were a necessary response to Neely's threatening behavior, aiming to protect passengers. Jurors sided with this view.
One testimony highlighted a passenger's fear, noting Neely's volatile statements about death and violence, reinforcing justifications for Penny's intervention.
In closing arguments, Penny’s lawyer posed a choice to jurors about their safety preferences, addressing fears of subway violence and public safety.
The trial involved over 40 witnesses, showcasing a spectrum of experiences that demonstrated a level of panic and fear aboard the train.
Collection
[
|
...
]