Polestar argues that the proposed rule's broad definition creates crippling uncertainty for businesses, indicating that a more clearly defined list would be beneficial.
The company emphasizes that if most manufacturing activities occur outside a foreign adversary's jurisdiction, mere ownership should not determine the rules' applicability.
Polestar highlights its U.S. organization, foreign board composition, and limited China-based employees, suggesting that national security concerns may not be warranted.
As the most impacted automaker, Polestar notes it is not alone, referencing similar import issues faced by Ford and General Motors under the new rule.
Collection
[
|
...
]