A SCOTUS case about trains could upend decades of environmental law.
Briefly

Dahlia Lithwick discusses the concerning implications of Christopher Wray's resignation as FBI director, highlighting the potential deterioration in law enforcement efficacy and adherence to the rule of law.
Mark Joseph Stern emphasizes that the Supreme Court's recent cases signal a troubling shift in how environmental regulations can be interpreted, particularly in favor of corporate interests, further endangering the planet.
Sam Sankar from Earth Justice outlines that the case concerning the railroad plan exemplifies how the Supreme Court's conservative majority selectively chooses cases to advance their agenda while struggling with the legal ramifications.
Read at Slate Magazine
[
|
]