Educators often hesitate to acknowledge that student behavior stems from external stimuli, fearing this undermines notions of autonomy. John Watson's deterministic approach posits that behavior could be controlled through stimuli, a notion resisted in cultures valuing freedom. Meanwhile, cognitive and constructivist theories have shifted focus from external influences to internal processes, thereby neglecting the role of stimuli in learning. While these theories provide valuable insights, they inadvertently overlook how explicit feedback and reinforcement are crucial in shaping student engagement and mastery.
Higher education increasingly overlooks how external stimuli shape student behavior, stemming from discomfort with the implications for human agency and autonomy.
Watson's deterministic approach has been resisted in Western culture, where individual freedom and personal responsibility are paramount, revealing tensions in understanding behavior.
While cognitive and constructivist theories have advanced education, they risk downplaying the significance of stimuli, which play a vital role in behavior and learning.
Educators must recognize that student behaviors are responses to stimuli, and understanding this can transform teaching practices to better engage students.
Collection
[
|
...
]