The article critiques medical guidelines that adopt satisficing—a decision-making approach that aims for adequacy rather than optimal solutions. This can lead to subpar patient care, particularly in breast cancer screening, where 2D mammograms might fail to detect tumors in women with dense breasts. The narrative of Debbie, who discovered an undiagnosed breast mass after assuming her yearly screenings were sufficient, underscores the dangers of relying exclusively on standard guidelines. It stresses the complexity of cancer types and the need for personalized screening methods to improve detection and outcomes.
Satisficing models in medical guidelines often do not serve the best interests of all patients, as they prioritize broad population needs over individual optimal care.
For women with dense breasts, 2D mammograms may miss small tumors, highlighting the need for more accurate 3D mammograms despite higher costs.
Some cancers are aggressive and can develop quickly, emphasizing that yearly screenings may not be sufficient to catch fast-growing tumors.
Debbie's experience illustrates the limitations of relying solely on annual mammograms for early detection of potentially aggressive breast cancer.
Collection
[
|
...
]