The article discusses the boundary between public photography and privacy rights, particularly in scenarios involving delivery drivers and influencers. It highlights that while capturing moments in public settings is a norm, it raises ethical questions when individuals share images or videos of private properties and people without consent. The piece emphasizes the difference between the legality of such actions and the moral implications, suggesting that just because one can document something does not necessarily mean one should. It also briefly touches on potential implications for those being filmed or photographed in various public situations.
If you're in public, you might end up in the background of someone else's photo. Just because she can, doesn't mean she should.
Homeowners don't expect that their food delivery comes with a side of architectural commentary. It's a modern life fact; however ethical concerns may arise.
Collection
[
|
...
]