The Guardian noted a significant change in its decision-making process due to the US presidential election campaign, stating: 'the campaign served only to underline what we have considered for a long time: that X is a toxic media platform.' This highlights their view that the platform's environment has deteriorated significantly.
The Guardian's decision emphasizes that the platform's downsides outweigh any benefits, as they remarked: 'the benefits of being on X are now outweighed by the negatives and that resources could be better used promoting our journalism elsewhere.' This indicates a strategic shift towards protecting journalistic integrity.
Faced with the criticism that the platform fosters hate speech, The Guardian succinctly encapsulated their concerns: 'Critics have said Musk's approach to the platform has allowed lies and hate speech to spread.' This serves to reflect the broader discontent surrounding content moderation issues on social media.
In stark response to the Guardian's exit, Elon Musk dismissed the outlet, saying, 'They are irrelevant,' which underscores his dismissive attitude towards media criticism and the implications of their decision to leave the platform.
Collection
[
|
...
]