The article discusses the U.S. government's expenditure of over $8 million on media subscriptions in 2024, particularly to left-leaning outlets like Politico and The New York Times. It critiques this spending, suggesting it's inappropriate for taxpayers to fund biased news sources. The author also highlights a larger issue of government support for these media outlets, while simultaneously stifling conservative and independent media through censorship practices. The piece emphasizes that this spending exemplifies a troubling relationship between the government and certain media organizations, reflecting broader concerns about bias and accountability.
Simply put, the American people should not be on the hook for news subscriptions to biased sources, or arguably to any sources at all.
That the feds have showered incalculably greater benefits on de facto regime media outlets by seeking to systematically suppress conservative and independent competitors through the Censorship-Industrial Complex.
We've forked over $8.2 million over the last 12 months across a bevy of agencies - including for pricey premium subscription services.
It's perverse that we've been shelling out millions to buy bureaucrats subscriptions to left-leaning media sources.
Collection
[
|
...
]