"In traditional news, simple language broadly helps with reader engagement but that does not mean complex language cannot work. When it is paired with a high level of narrativity and the story flows from bad-to-good, it can be successful. This format is regularly seen in some highly successful magazine-style publications like The New Yorker or Time Magazine."
"What we were trying to do is take an objective approach to breaking down these highly subjective processes which we typically don't have insight into. Researchers tested several storytelling variables, including emotional sequencing - whether a story begins with bad news and then proceeds to good news, or vice versa."
"But in satirical (news), it actually decreases engagement. One finding: Stories that moved from bad news to good news tended to perform better in traditional news formats written at lower reading levels. Another storytelling aspect they exam"
Headlines and ledes often serve as entry points for readers, but engagement is driven by how a story is told and how its features work together. A study used traditional and satirical news from the same Indian publisher, then rewrote stories with large language models by manipulating narrative structure, emotional sequencing, and reading complexity. More than 500 participants evaluated the rewritten versions. Results showed that simple language can help in traditional news, but complex language can also succeed when paired with high narrativity and a bad-to-good flow. Emotional sequencing mattered: moving from bad news to good news improved performance in traditional formats at lower reading levels, while the same pattern reduced engagement in satirical news.
Read at Poynter
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]