"As Mark Ritson argues, it is finely produced and finally brings some differentiation to the category. But it isn't built for the distracted, half-watching audience. It's biggest sin? Not leaning on distinctive brand assets that burn themselves into the memory of viewers who barely know what Claude is. It asks for attention, context, and a working understanding of the AI arms race. In other words, it violates the first law of Super Bowl advertising: nobody is doing homework during the commercial break."
"Because Claude's spot, built around the line "Ads are coming to AI. But not to Claude," probably isn't really an attempt to win the Super Bowl ad game. It's a corporate strategy move: a commercial that functions less like demand generation and more like a public memo to the market. Anthropic didn't buy a Super Bowl ad to win the living room - if they did, they'll be left with misattribution and weak recall."
Anthropic launched a Super Bowl commercial for Claude AI that breaks traditional Super Bowl advertising rules by requiring attention, context, and knowledge of the AI arms race. The spot centers on the line 'Ads are coming to AI. But not to Claude,' positioning the product as distinct from ad-driven AI models. The ad deliberately avoids relying on instantly memorable brand assets and thus sacrifices broad consumer recall. The expenditure functions as a corporate signal to investors, boardrooms, press, and competitors rather than as demand-generation. The campaign reframes advertising as corporate communications and suggests evolving priorities for marketing effectiveness frameworks.
Read at Forbes
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]