Joe Pressney, waiting for the train, initially enjoyed the line rebranding, but when he learned it cost 6.3 million, he changed his mind. He remarked, 'It's not a good change if it cost 6.3 million.' His reaction highlights the tension between cultural significance and financial expenditure.
Lucia Morras argued the rebrand makes navigation easier and the chosen names are fitting for London. She pointed out, 'Considering we spent over 70 million on a posh parade for a royal, I think we can push out 6 million to make our transport more accessible.' This underscores a perspective that prioritizes practical benefits.
Liz Fox mentioned her hope that the new names would simplify navigating the Overground for visitors, stating, 'If you're not from London it must be very confusing.' This reflects a common concern about usability for tourists in a densely named transit system.
Josh Morris critiqued the cost as excessive but acknowledged some positive aspects of the names. Humorously, he said, 'I could have done it for you for 100,' showcasing a frustration with TfL's spending while recognizing the potential of the initiative.
Collection
[
|
...
]