Campaigners opposed to the Wimbledon tennis expansion plan express determination to fight back against the decision, considering legal action to challenge its legality.
While AELTC believes the decision will enhance Wimbledon as a world sport venue and benefit community access, opponents argue it is an aggressive and environmentally damaging development.
Deputy mayor admitted that the project constitutes inappropriate development on Metropolitan Open Land but justified the decision based on the perceived benefits versus environmental harm.
The ongoing concern regarding whether the land is held under a statutory trust remains, as it potentially impacts the legality of construction and previous court decisions.
Collection
[
|
...
]