Walz missed opportunities to counter Vance's presentation effectively, allowing Vance to frame the Trump campaign's agenda as reasonable for average families.
Vance exhibited poise and control during the debate, providing a polished case for the Trump administration while positioning Walz defensively on key issues.
The debate was notable for its civility and policy focus, almost making one forget the divisive history of Trump's political rise.
While Vance acknowledged public concerns about climate change, he diluted the discussion by framing human causation as merely hypothetical, underscoring Republican dismissals of the issue.
Collection
[
|
...
]