Luntz stated that voters were shocked at how accommodative and emotional Vance was in his debate with Walz, revealing a side they hadn't seen before.
The language used by voters suggested they believed Vance had been misused in the campaign, and that he could more effectively communicate Trump's agenda.
Voters described Vance as 'battle-tested, very intelligent, in control, sincere, and authentic,' showing a significant shift in perception after the debate.
Luntz noted this movement towards Vance was significant, citing only twice in his career witnessing such overwhelming support for a candidate.
Collection
[
|
...
]