Chief Justice John Roberts stated, 'The oral argument is the tip of the iceberg - the most visible part of the process - but the briefs are more important.' This illustrates a common belief among justices that initial impressions often arise from written briefs rather than oral presentations.
Roberts elaborated, 'It really varies on the case. ... Usually, you've got concerns. I'm leaning this way, but I need a better answer to this problem.' This indicates that although justices may have a leaning, oral arguments are still significant for clarifying concerns.
Justice Scalia highlighted the benefit of oral argument: '...one of the benefits of oral argument - you can put things in perspective the way a brief can't.' This acknowledges how attorneys can emphasize crucial points that may not stand out in written briefs.
Collection
[
|
...
]