The U.S. Supreme Court ruled ex-Presidents like Trump have broad immunity, limiting prosecution for actions extending beyond official duties. The decision, split 6-3 along partisan lines, handed a Washington criminal case back to a lower court regarding Trump's alleged conspiracy to overturn the 2020 Presidential loss through obstruction and conspiracy.
The opinion found Trump 'absolutely immune' from prosecution for conduct involving discussions with the Justice Department. He is also 'at least presumptively immune' from allegations of pressuring Vice President Pence to reject certification of the vote, not allowing scrutiny into motives or declaring an action unofficial based on violating laws.
David Becker, an election law expert, criticized the Supreme Court's decision, highlighting the 'incredibly broad' and 'deeply disturbing' immunity granted to Trump. He pointed out that almost any president's action with the executive branch is deemed an official act, posing concerns about accountability and legal boundaries.
#supreme-court-ruling #presidential-immunity #legal-implications #conspiracy-allegations #election-law
Collection
[
|
...
]