US supreme court curbed public scrutiny as it boosted security before Roe ruling
Briefly

The memorandum indicates that prior to overturning Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court sought to enhance security while simultaneously reducing public access to judicial records.
The MOA manages security-related records, keeping them from Freedom of Information Act scrutiny, suggesting an intention to limit public knowledge about judicial activities.
Gabe Roth from Fix the Court emphasized concerns that the Supreme Court seems resistant to public records requests, seeking to improve confidentiality over accountability.
The timing of the MOA, coinciding with public distrust in the Supreme Court, raises questions about the transparency of the judicial system and its decisions.
Read at www.theguardian.com
[
|
]