Jill Barton reveals that the U.S. Supreme Court has evolved in writing style, embracing contractions and simpler phrases, contrasting with traditional legal writing.
After analyzing over 10,000 pages of Supreme Court opinions, Barton concludes that the justices are open to modernizing their writing, prioritizing clarity and fluidity.
Notably, Justice Scalia, a staunch opponent of contractions, shifted his approach towards the end of his tenure, reflecting the court's evolving stance on language.
Barton emphasizes that Chief Justice Roberts prioritizes rhythm over rigid grammatical rules, demonstrating the court's liberal approach to writing compared to past practices.
Collection
[
|
...
]