"Welcome to "remedy-palooza." While that specific term may not take off, it's not a bad way to describe the vibe right now. We recently got a final remedy decision in the DOJ v. Google Search antitrust case and we're in the midst of the remedies trial phase of the DOJ v. Google publisher ad tech antitrust trial. Closing arguments in the latter case are scheduled for November 17 in Alexandria, Virginia."
"And what about the uncomfortable position of being on the side of Google, as Chamber of Progress is? It's no fun to be framed as on the side of the evil empire set against the sympathetic rebel alliance. In the ad tech case, that would be publishers. "I don't represent them," Vidushi notes, meaning Google, "but ... that's definitely, I feel, the environment in the courtroom.""
A final remedy decision was issued in the DOJ v. Google Search antitrust case, and the remedies trial phase is underway in the DOJ v. Google publisher ad tech antitrust case. Closing arguments in the publisher ad tech case are scheduled for November 17 in Alexandria, Virginia. Vidushi Dyall, director of legal analysis at the Chamber of Progress, has tracked Google cases from courtrooms and notes Chamber members are involved in multiple suits. The litigation landscape includes Epic Games suits against Google Android and Apple and federal suits alleging monopolistic control by Amazon and Apple. Courtroom dynamics reflect tensions between publishers and platform defenders.
Read at AdExchanger
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]