The Fifth Circuit's Jurisprudence Is Too Far Right Even For This Supreme Court
Briefly

The Fifth Circuit has become notable for its tendency to diverge significantly from the legal standards upheld by the rest of the federal judiciary, resulting in frequent reversals by the Supreme Court.
In Garland v. VanDerStok, the Supreme Court appears poised to overturn a Fifth Circuit ruling regarding 'ghost guns', reflecting the ongoing tension between firearm regulations and judicial interpretations at the circuit level.
Despite strong challenges from gun rights advocates in the Fifth Circuit, the Biden administration's appeal indicates a critical battle over understanding federal gun regulations in the Supreme Court's hands.
The Supreme Court's previous decision to allow the enforcement of the rule concerning ghost guns hints at a potential shift in the judicial approach towards more favorable perspectives on gun control and regulation.
Read at Above the Law
[
|
]